Taking Down Kissinger's "World Order"

Angelo Codevilla crushes HK's World Order book, which came out last year to some hoopla.  (Did HK write it?   I saw him in an airport three years ago, then wheelchair-bound, frail, and looking out-of-it.)  Here's the link to the review:  the-courage-of-kissingers-contradictions


I post it because it sums up nicely many of the reservations and criticisms pro-Reagan conservative writers have had of Kissinger's work and thought over the years.  In short, "world order" supposedly is something nations strive for, and what US foreign policy should strive for, but it is never defined.  It seems to be some sort of great power balance.


Codevilla points out this quest for balance drove Kissinger to seek accommodations with the Soviet Union, treating it as a great power with similar goals and aspirations as the US had.  Then came the invasion of Afghanistan, which blew up that theory.  Realists like Kissinger didn't want to break up the Soviet Union.   We might also note Kissinger lavish recent praise for the way China manages things.


I read World Order and also grabbled with the vagueness and lack of clear definitions.  I took issue with HK's views that the world is somehow more disorderly than in the past.  (How do you judge that?) It strikes me as being just the opposite.


In essence,  can't any foreign policy objective be defined as pursuing world order?  Wasn't Bush arguing, in effect, that the invasion of Iraq was an attempt to maintain world order?   Of course it was, just like the earlier Gulf war had been.  Was world order served?

Happy Fourth of July!

The Spirit of '76  painted by Civil War veteran A. M. Willard, around 1875. 

Be Kind to Greece

Greece is down, and everyone is kicking it.  Greece used to dominate in math, science, philosophy, and architecture.   But as Gary Gulman says, in the last 2000 years, it has just focused on salad: Gulman on Greece


Funny, but unfair.   Greece did everything the IMF and the EU wanted it to do to recover economically, and now it's bankrupt.  Doesn't this say more about the bankruptcy of austerity measures?    Here's the best article I've read so far on Greece's problem:  Ten Things They're Not Telling You About Greece


Greece should abandon Euro, asap.  Other countries in Europe have gotten along just fine without it.  This is not hard. 

The Cold Cyberwar We Live In

The data breaches of major US firms and government agencies threatens to become--no, has become--a critical national security issue.  An ongoing cold cyberwar represents the new reality.


The attacks on the Office of Personnel Management and US Investigative Services, a private firm that conducts background investigations for the government, obviously is a planned strategy.  It has exposed millions of personnel records.  It is undermining public confidence in our security clearance system. This from the Washington Post today: 

The massive cyberattack last year on the federal contractor that conducted background investigations for security clearances may have been even more widespread than previously known, affecting the police force that protects Congress and an intelligence agency that helped track down Osama bin Laden.

After Falls Church, Va.-based USIS suffered the intrusion, the Office of Personnel Management and the Department of Homeland Security issued stop-work orders to the company. And eventually OPM, which conducts background checks for the overwhelming majority of the federal government, canceled USIS’s contracts, effectively putting the company out of business.

But now USIS has told Congress in a letter obtained by The Washington Post that the breach may have been even more damaging: OPM, two DHS agencies — Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement — the U.S. Capitol Police and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency were all hit.

Who's doing this?  The Russians or the Chinese, probably.  We need better cyber forensics to figure it out.  And a proportional means of retaliation.  Our defensive strategy is sorely lacking.

Justice Thomas's Dissent

In the Gay Marriage ruling,  Justice Thomas explains that liberty is only something the government can take away from you.  Liberty does not me being provided a government benefit.  Likewise, dignity is not something the government can hold from you either.   You preserve, or give up, your own dignity. 


Read the ruling here:  Much of it, including CJ Roberts's dissent, gives a short history on where our liberties come from in the first place, and is of great value. Supreme Court opinion

Waterloo: 200 Years Ago Today

One of the great battles of history.   But was it that decisive?   Leipzig a year earlier pretty much sealed Napoleon's fate.   The Seven Coalition never would have let him survive in power after his dramatic return from exile and coup d'état against Louis XIX. 


But still:  if only Marshal Soult had been with Napoleon that day!  If only Grouchy had screened Bluecher Prussian army! 


If only they hadn't attacked British squares with cavalry!  Even I know that. 

The Mysterious Ukraine Crisis, Explained

What really happened in the Ukraine?   It seems like an artificial crisis to me.  Why try to get Ukraine into the EU?   Why would Putin want to support separatists, rather than influence Ukrainian democratic politics?   Both sides acted irrationally.  Now that the stories have died down, perhaps we can look at this issue dispassionately. 

I never understood why the U.S. was so anxious to dispose President Yanukovych.  He was democratically elected.  Perhaps we didn't care for his alignment with Moscow, but so what?   It is hardly vital to our interests who governs Ukraine. 

Well,  George Friedman of Stratfor explains that our policy is geared toward opposing regional hegemons.  So if Russia is getting too strong, we must do something to throw it off balance.  Our support for the protestors in Ukraine had more to do with making problems for Russia in its own front yard.  It was not in retaliation for Syria or Snowden.   See this very interesting interview with Friedman here:  Friedman on the Ukraine crisis

One thing of note: Friedman seems pretty certain that what happened in Ukraine was a US-backed coup against Yanukovych.   Using protesters as shock troops against government forces to discredit a sitting government has been used effectively in Latin America for years.   I had to say, that at the time, it looked like a pretty familiar scenario!  (See Bolivia,  Ecuador, and Venezuela in 2002.) 

The happy reactionary Peter Hitchens in the Mail adds his two cents, with a review on a new book "Frontline Ukraine" describing the Ukraine crisis here: a-review-of-frontline-ukraine-by-richard-sakwa  I need to read this book.  Here, Hitchens argues the US dragged the EU into this crisis reluctantly.  We are still pursuing a policy of expanding the EU and NATO, even though it is clear that both are suffering from overexpansion.